How to Actually Win at AI in 2026

The quarterly planning meeting started normally enough.

Revenue projections looked solid. The team had shipped the features on the roadmap. Customer churn was acceptable. But when the CEO asked about the AI strategy, the room went quiet. Not because there wasn't a strategy (there was a deck, actually a good one), but because everyone knew the real question wasn't being asked.

The real question was: why are we still having strategy meetings about AI when our competitors stopped talking and started shipping six months ago?

This isn't another blog post telling you AI will change everything. You already know that. This is about the specific things that will separate organizations that survive 2026 from those that don't. Because the window for experimentation is closing faster than most people realize.

Hi, we're Roro - A full-stack product innovation studio for technology companies. Got a project in mind? Let's talk.

The Era of AI Tourism Is Over

For the past two years, it's been acceptable to run pilots. To explore. To "learn about the space." That time is done. CFOs are now killing more AI projects than CTOs are launching, and for good reason. They're demanding proof that matters. Not innovation theater. Not "transformational potential." Actual P&L impact, measured in quarters, not years.

The vendors who survive procurement in 2026 will be the ones who can answer a brutally simple question: what specific salary expense does this replace, or what revenue does this generate? Everything else is noise.

This shift changes everything about how you approach AI. The "AI for AI's sake" era is over. Your next AI initiative needs to demonstrate measurable business value within three quarters, or you won't get funding for the one after that. 85% of C-level AI decision-makers expect ROI within three years. That's not a suggestion. That's the bar.

And here's what's changing the game: Big Tech's monopoly on competitive AI models is breaking down. New training approaches have proven you don't need the biggest, most expensive models to get strong performance. Companies are taking open-source foundation models and customizing them with their own data. This democratization means more organizations can build tailored AI solutions without depending solely on OpenAI, Google, or Anthropic.

Your Hiring Strategy Just Became Obsolete

The demand for AI-literate engineers is outpacing supply by a margin that can't be closed with external hiring. Companies are being forced to invest in internal training and hybrid teams rather than relying on new hires. If your talent strategy for 2026 is "hire more AI engineers," you've already lost.

The winning approach? Stop trying to hire mythical AI unicorns and start systematically upskilling the people you already have. The engineers who know your systems, your customers, your business? They're the ones who need to become AI-literate. Not eventually. Now.

But here's what makes this complicated: traditional training doesn't work at the speed required. Gene Kim points out that trust in AI tools correlates directly with usage frequency and duration. You can't send people to a workshop and expect transformation. They need to use these tools daily, fail with them, understand their limitations, and learn to delegate appropriately. That takes time your competitors have already invested.

The other reality? Smaller, AI-augmented teams are achieving more than larger traditional teams. That math changes your entire organizational structure. You don't need more headcount. You need the right capabilities distributed differently across fewer people who understand how to work alongside AI systems.
‍

AI Agents Bring a Governance Crisis You're Not Ready For

As fleets of autonomous agents proliferate across your data systems, you're about to discover that your biggest bottleneck isn't model performance. It's governance. Traditional identity and access management tools can't keep pace with short-lived, dynamic agents acting across hundreds of services.

The enterprise data stack needs to become "agent-ready" by default. By the end of 2026, connectivity, governance, and context provisioning for AI agents will be built into every serious data platform. If your architecture doesn't account for this, you're building technical debt that will compound quickly.

Most organizations won't have the time or resources to build bespoke control planes for AI governance. The successful ones will adopt open frameworks and shared standards (protocols that let both humans and machines query, act, and collaborate safely within the same governed data plane).

Vince Campisi at RTX describes the approach that works: map activities to track progress, measure results to verify outcomes, monitor quality to ensure goals are achieved. As AI becomes more agentic, governance needs to start with leadership intent and build in explainability so humans can verify results. The old model of gate-keeping every decision creates friction that kills speed.
‍

Your AI Pilots Are Failing on Accuracy and Adoption

CEOs are now looking to CTOs to stabilize AI pilots and agents that are failing. Not because the technology doesn't work, but because organizations underestimated the importance of data quality, governance, and output monitoring.

Most enterprises still lack AI-ready data. I'm talking about data that's trustworthy, governed, contextualized, and aligned to specific use cases. Despite enormous investment in AI capabilities, the data layer hasn't caught up. Solving the AI-readiness gap needs to become the primary investment priority for data leaders in 2026. Not the exciting priority. The necessary one.

The pattern repeating across industries: organizations launch AI initiatives, get underwhelming results, and blame the technology. But when you dig into the failures, it's almost always data quality, insufficient governance, or poor change management. The technology works. Your foundation doesn't.

Here's the reality check: business-critical AI applications require precise, measurable accuracy, not probabilistic answers. While consumer AI can afford to occasionally get things wrong, enterprise systems need exact answers to questions like "How much revenue did we generate yesterday?" Organizations will demand systematic methods to measure agent accuracy before deploying them at scale. Domain-specific testing standards will be essential for taking agentic AI from pilot projects to core business operations.

Daniel Dines at UiPath offers advice that sounds obvious but gets ignored constantly: "Rather than getting stuck in a cycle of perpetual proofs of concept, consider attacking your biggest problem and go for a big outcome." Stop running safe pilots. Pick your hardest problem. Throw AI at it. If it works, you've proven real value. If it doesn't, you've learned something that matters.

Platform Engineering Becomes Non-Negotiable

AI-native platforms and domain-specific models are reshaping how work gets done. Smaller, AI-augmented teams can achieve more, but they need the right infrastructure. Platform engineering shifts from optional to essential in 2026.

The successful organizations are building modular, API-first architectures with embedded security, compliance, and review capabilities. Not as an afterthought. As the foundation. Neeraj Tolmare at Coca-Cola describes their approach: "For global organizations, one size rarely fits all. We've built a modular architecture and a set of guiding core principles supported by an agile team able to operate at speed while localizing as needed."

That's the model that scales. Central principles with local flexibility. Platform capabilities that teams can consume without reinventing foundational components. Speed without chaos. Governance without friction.

Alan Davidson at Broadcom frames the priority correctly: "Modernization is not about technology for technology's sake; it's about addressing fundamental business problems like costs, go-to-market issues, and so on." If your platform engineering effort isn't solving specific business problems with measurable outcomes, you're building the wrong thing.

Ideas Will Matter More Than Execution

Here's the shift that will catch most organizations off guard: as AI agents handle more of the actual work of building and implementing projects, your bottleneck won't be execution anymore. It'll be the quality of your ideas.

This change is both liberating and daunting. Teams can now rapidly prototype and deploy solutions that once took months. But success depends entirely on asking the right questions and setting the right direction. As execution becomes commoditized, strategic thinking and vision will separate high-performing organizations from the rest.

The divide is already emerging between teams that use AI to amplify their own creativity and those who use it as a crutch. One group leverages AI to expand their thinking and push ideas further and faster. The other takes the easy route, churning out generic content that floods the market but doesn't resonate. Organizations that empower people to think strategically and use AI to enhance (rather than replace) their own creativity will dominate their industries.

The CIO Role Expands Whether You Want It To Or Not

Seventy percent of CIOs say their primary role with AI is either implementing it across the enterprise or serving as an evangelist for the technology. That's a fundamental shift from traditional IT leadership. You're no longer just the person who keeps systems running. You're the person explaining to the board why AI will or won't transform specific business functions.

Sesh Tirumala at Western Digital describes his current role as a combination of traditional CIO plus chief data officer, chief AI officer, and chief digital officer. That's not empire building. That's reality. When technology decisions determine business outcomes at every level, the technology leader needs to be in every strategic conversation.

The most successful CIOs in 2026 will be orchestrators and integrators rather than owners of infrastructure. Almost a third say that orchestrating fellow tech leaders is essential in the next eighteen months. The role requires deeper integration with business strategy and enterprise-wide transformation. You're both a change agent and a responsible gatekeeper.

If you're still spending most of your time in technical architecture reviews and vendor negotiations, you're operating with the wrong playbook. The C-suite expects you to articulate how technology creates market advantage. If that's not you, they'll find someone who can.

What Actually Matters for the Next Twelve Months

Strip away the hype and focus on what delivers results:

Fix your data foundation first. Your AI initiatives are only as good as your data quality. Invest in making data trustworthy, governed, and contextualized before building more AI features. This isn't exciting work, but it's necessary work.

Measure everything that matters. Stop accepting vague promises about "transformational potential." Every AI initiative needs clear metrics tied to business outcomes. Revenue generated. Costs reduced. Time saved. If you can't measure it, don't fund it.

Upskill aggressively. You can't hire your way out of the AI talent gap. Build systematic internal training programs that give people daily hands-on experience with AI tools. Theory doesn't work here. Usage does.

Rebuild governance for speed. If your approval processes take weeks, you've designed friction into the system. Continuous monitoring with embedded controls beats quarterly audits every time. Governance should enable speed, not prevent it.

Attack real problems. Stop running safe pilots. Pick your hardest business problem and throw AI at it. If it works, you've proven value. If it doesn't, you've learned something that matters. Either outcome beats another successful proof of concept that never ships.

Invest in strategic thinking. As AI handles more execution work, the quality of your ideas becomes your competitive advantage. Don't let your team default to generic AI-generated content. Push them to use AI as a tool that amplifies their own creativity and strategic vision.

Build for modularity. AI-native architectures require modularity and observability from the ground up. Not as nice-to-have features, but as fundamental requirements. Your legacy systems won't carry you into this era.

Act while competitors plan. The organizations winning in 2026 share a common trait: they ship while others strategize. They learn while others debate. Speed matters more than perfection when the landscape is changing this fast.

The Window Is Closing

By the end of 2026, the gap between organizations that moved quickly and those that planned cautiously will be visible in market performance, talent retention, and competitive positioning. The companies that treated AI as another incremental technology improvement will be explaining to stakeholders why their development cycles are three times longer than their competitors.

This isn't about chasing every trend. It's about recognizing when the underlying economics of your business have fundamentally changed and responding accordingly. The "explore and learn" phase is over. The "deliver measurable value" phase has started.

If your engineering velocity hasn't meaningfully improved in the last six months, you're falling behind. If your architectural decisions still assume primarily human development teams, you're building for the past. If your governance processes require weeks of approvals for routine changes, you've designed friction into the system.

Tracey Franklin at Moderna puts it bluntly: "Companies need to get better at constant road mapping and iteration because the era of 'build it once and forget it' is over." The ground is shifting. The only question is whether you're shifting with it.

The most successful technology leaders in 2026 won't be the ones who implemented AI perfectly. They'll be the ones who moved fast enough to learn what works in their specific context before the market opportunity closed. Everything else is commentary.

Not sure where to start or how to accelerate what you're already doing? We can help you quickly analyze how you could speed things up and become future-ready with AI. Reach out and let's figure out what makes sense for your organization.